data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f8d7/0f8d747db113ef45c81665bcde7173e4e053c2d3" alt=""
As close observers may know, I am in the throes of writing an SF novel (am about halfway through the first draft, and have a very able advisor for the more technical elements of the book), but my science fiction reading, especially in recent years, has been pretty limited, and what I have read, outside of Interzone, I've found pretty dull (Stephen Baxter, Greg Bear...) I never have really been a big SF reader, more fantasy. I've never read Asimov, or Zelazny. What gives me hope is I remember reading some while ago that Neil Gaiman always wanted to be a science fiction writer, as that was what he loved, but ended up writing fantasy.
Part of this new book is set in post-almost apocalyptic Britain where I'm on firmer ground--thank you 2000AD et al--but the other section is set in a, for want of a more appropriate phrase, virtual reality.
Outside of Neuromancer, I'm not much of a cyberpunk. I toyed with the idea of reading Neal Stephenson's Snow Crash, and also gave Charles Stross' Halting State a go recently, but these books are built, really, around gaming, which is something that, obviously others have done already, and also doesn't interest me much. But, perhaps more to the point, I find them a little intimidating. They make me wonder if I can really pull this off.
3 comments:
Zelazny wrote a little bit of straight-up sci-fi, but he's really verging more into fantasy. I think you'd enjoy him--Lord of Light is one of my favorite novels--but I doubt he'd help you come to grips with the field.
For that matter, I haven't read many thrillers. I just happened to write one. Ao I wouldn't worry about it.
Oh, well if he's fantasy, then I can read him without cause for concern. Actually, the SF I've read is older stuff, I guess pre-90s.
Actually, I've read a fair bit of space opera and billion of years away stuff to, like M John Harrison and Justina Robson, but that's so far out there--like Iain M Banks I suppose--that's it's far enough away to be almost fantasy. It's the round the corner plausible stuff, that'll be outdated in the next forty years or so that's the issue--my main grounding in this is Back to the Future II, although maybe that's not such a bad thing...
Not that I mean the 1980's are really old or anything, David, you understand.
Post a Comment